The mainstream science community is STILL looking for dark matter and dark energy. One does not even need to go down the scientific logical argument to point out what the matter is, one simply needs to step back from the problem and provide focus for resolution.
Like a camera fighting for focus, our minds, our intelligence fights to grasp an interpretation of the data that is coming to us through our senses. What about the data coming to us that is not detectable by our five known senses?
How often have you found yourself in a less than optimum situation? Do you think we think you intentionally chose to put yourself in that situation?
Who do you look to? One looks to who? You who?
So, simply, a worldview change is required, a priori, even before attempting to discuss physics and science and logic.
Are you willing to discuss worldviews? I mean, are you truly willing? Before answering, let's find out what a worldview is and compare 2 different world views.
One worldview is our present scientific worldview - it is a disconnected worldview analyzed using isolated systems and Cartesian thinking.
A second world view is a connected world view represented quite artistically here with this little video preview:
A worldview is a perspective, and from a balanced perspective, one can see there are many possible worldviews, many possible perspectives.
So, tell me, are you really willing do discuss worldviews? Do you really want to... make my day?
Counting comes in handy, 5 or 6?
I forgot to mention, Elizabeth Rauscher and Nassim Haramein already explained the dark matter and dark energy in their 2004 paper:
The Surfer, OM-IV