Future Proves Past (Q’s back)

Present the answer first then show the derivation.  Present the answer then ask the question.  That is the technique used by this blog and other intelligence operations.

June 22, 2022

https://www.drudgereportarchives.com/data/2022/06/23/20220623_031558.htm

https://news.google.com/stories/CAAqNggKIjBDQklTSGpvSmMzUnZjbmt0TXpZd1NoRUtEd2l4MEtuQ0JSR2NZdUFhNG5ON05DZ0FQAQ?ceid=US:en&oc=3

Excel VBA macro: The Oracle Physics Constants Generator Rev 3.0 - The Oracle - TOPCG_r3p0

This is a work in progress to investigate the uniqueness and stability of the sign-flip solution to the Full Rydberg polynomial for a single electron hydrogen atom at 0K using a MS Excel VBA macro.

The link points to an Excel file with the VBA macro.  Enable macros to run.

1. Download Excel file (must have MS Excel to run VBA macros) 
• https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zCjG4vCKGWRbo-cSSf0ouitbehpCPIvV/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=103725077496823758319&rtpof=true&sd=true
2. Open the downloaded Excel file and enable macros 
3. Default is set to 8 digits, runs in under a minute (worksheet calculation is off by default)
4. Once done running , click Formulas -> Calculate sheet to process plots
5. Scroll to right of data window and pan around to make plots update and click Formulas -> Calculate

3 constants are set as fixed (golden/yellow) and the remainder vary.  

These are initial results.  Uniqueness and stability has not been proven/demonstrated yet.  

screen captures:

TheOracle-TopPCG_rev3p0 initial and golden values at top of file (8 digits accuracy)

Error (8 digits resolution)

The Surfer, OM-IV

Ω

One for Each Constant Sounds Fair

National_Medal_of_Science

&

1 of these

Presidential_Medal_of_Freedom

Awarded for	"An especially meritorious contribution to the security or national interests of the United States, world peace, cultural or other significant public or private endeavors."

2011/2012 PDF: Pohl et al: "Is the proton radius a player in the redefinition of the International System of Units?"

https://www.academia.edu/13513015/Is_the_proton_radius_a_player_in_the_redefinition_of_the_International_System_of_Units

This paper outlines how the constants and pertinent information about the system...

More later.

From the PDF:

"It is now recognized that the International System of Units (SI units) will be redefined in terms of fundamental constants, even if the date when this will occur is still under debate. Actually, the best estimate of fundamental constant values is given by a least squares adjustment, carried out under the auspices of the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA) Task Group on Fundamental Constants. This adjustment provides a significant measure of the correctness and overall consistency of the basic theories and experimental methods of physics using the values of the constants obtained from widely differing experiments. The physical theories that underlie this adjustment are assumed to be valid, such as quantum electrodynamics (QED). Testing QED, one of the most precise theories is the aim of many accurate experiments. The calculations and the corresponding experiments can be carried out either on a boundless system, such as the electron magnetic moment anomaly, or on a bound system, such as atomic hydrogen. The value of fundamental constants can be deduced from the comparison of theory and experiment. For example, using QED calculations, the value of the fine structure 

∗Author for correspondence (francois.nez@spectro.jussieu.fr). One contribution of 15 to a Discussion Meeting Issue ‘The new SI based on fundamental constants’. 4064 This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society Downloaded from rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org on November 23, 2012 Proton radius to redefine SI units 4065 

constant given by the CODATA is mainly inferred from the measurement of the electron magnetic moment anomaly carried out by Gabrielse’s group. (Hanneke et al. 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120801) The value of the Rydberg constant is known from two photon spectroscopy of hydrogen combined with accurate theoretical quantities. The Rydberg constant, determined by the comparison of theory and experiment using atomic hydrogen, is known with a relative uncertainty of 6.6 × 10−12. It is one of the most accurate fundamental constants to date. A careful analysis shows that knowledge of the electrical size of the proton is nowadays a limitation in this comparison. The aim of muonic hydrogen spectroscopy was to obtain an accurate value of the proton charge radius. However, the value deduced from this experiment contradicts other less accurate determinations. This problem is known as the proton radius puzzle. This new determination of the proton radius may affect the value of the Rydberg constant R∞. This constant is related to many fundamental constants; in particular, R∞ links the two possible ways proposed for the redefinition of the kilogram, the Avogadro constant NA and the Planck constant h. However, the current relative uncertainty on the experimental determinations of NA or h is three orders of magnitude larger than the ‘possible’ shift of the Rydberg constant, which may be shown by the new value of the size of the proton radius determined from muonic hydrogen. The proton radius puzzle will not interfere in the redefinition of the kilogram. After a short introduction to the properties of the proton, we will describe the muonic hydrogen experiment. There is intense theoretical activity as a result of our observation. A brief summary of possible theoretical explanations at the date of writing of the paper will be given. The contribution of the proton radius puzzle to the redefinition of SI-based units will then be examined."

Nassim Haramein on the Radius Of The Proton - "all of a sudden all of standard the standard model QED just goes out the window"

2019 - electron re-measurement of proton radius agrees with muonic measurement verifying proton radius puzzle

"something that really is remarkable that

happened in last few weeks there was

papers that were published they were

able to remeasure the radius of the

proton more precisely using standard

standard techniques that is using

electrons instead of muons one

remaining criticism on my prediction of

the radius the proton which is critical

was that oh well this new radius of the

proton which is 4 percent smaller than

is predicted by QED by the standard

model is maybe wrong although it was

verified twice 2010 and 2013 and it

produced what's called a proton puzzle

the proton radius puzzle you know there

was a lot of you know literature saying

well maybe because they use muons which

are every electrons they flex the proton

radius you know the the the elasticity

of the proton radius kind of pushed and

when the when the electron was scattered

off it and that's why a smaller radius

and all this stuff trying to avoid the

problem because if the radius is 4

percent smaller all of a sudden all of

standard the standard model QED just

goes out the window

because it's highly reliant on that

radius being specifically what used to

be and so in the last few weeks

published papers were reporting on

experiments that were done where they

use normal electrons they use the the

earlier techniques but more precisely

and they got the same radius they got

the radius that they got from the view

on experiment the radius that my

equations predict so that means that and

it's funny

because the standard like this there's

actually articles in the press out there

saying Oh physics is not broken after

all we got the wig we got we confirmed

that the radius was the new onyx radius

well actually that's wrong

yeah and this physicists out there

they're little confused because the fact

that we predict that these these that

they confirmed this radius having been

four percent smaller totally breaks

physics I mean the standard model of

physics the universe is doing just fine

but the standard model of physics broken

QEDS in big trouble because the

Rydberg constant which is very

precisely measured as well and the

radius of proton now being four percent

smaller precisely measured there doesn't

work inside the QED theory that is you

know the QED theory actually used the

proton radius as as a variable to adjust

to the Rydberg constant and you know

it give the radius that they thought it

was now if it's four percent smaller all

of a sudden the Rydberg constant goes

up in smoke which was thought to be you

know the most precise prediction of any

theory you know on the planet ever well

all of a sudden it's it's wrong by a

long shot you know because it was

precise to like some 12 or 10 digit

accuracy but if it's four percent wrong

now it's not precise at all and so and

so the only theory that actually gives

the correct Rydberg constant and radius

of the proton and its mass and the mass

of the universe of course and the mass

you know without the need for dark

matter and dark energy and the mass of

all the electrons the only theory that

actually does the job

is the holographic math solution and

that's why it gives the correct

prediction for the radius the protons

that's a really good"