This paper outlines how the constants and pertinent information about the system...
More later.
From the PDF:
"It is now recognized that the International System of Units (SI units) will be redefined
in terms of fundamental constants, even if the date when this will occur is still under
debate. Actually, the best estimate of fundamental constant values is given by a least squares adjustment, carried out under the auspices of the Committee on Data for Science
and Technology (CODATA) Task Group on Fundamental Constants. This adjustment
provides a significant measure of the correctness and overall consistency of the basic
theories and experimental methods of physics using the values of the constants obtained
from widely differing experiments. The physical theories that underlie this adjustment are
assumed to be valid, such as quantum electrodynamics (QED). Testing QED, one of the
most precise theories is the aim of many accurate experiments. The calculations and the
corresponding experiments can be carried out either on a boundless system, such as the
electron magnetic moment anomaly, or on a bound system, such as atomic hydrogen.
The value of fundamental constants can be deduced from the comparison of theory
and experiment. For example, using QED calculations, the value of the fine structure
∗Author for correspondence (francois.nez@spectro.jussieu.fr). One contribution of 15 to a Discussion Meeting Issue ‘The new SI based on fundamental constants’. 4064 This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society Downloaded from rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org on November 23, 2012 Proton radius to redefine SI units 4065
constant given by the CODATA is mainly inferred from the measurement of the electron
magnetic moment anomaly carried out by Gabrielse’s group. (Hanneke et al. 2008
Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120801) The value of the Rydberg constant is known from two photon spectroscopy of hydrogen combined with accurate theoretical quantities. The
Rydberg constant, determined by the comparison of theory and experiment using atomic
hydrogen, is known with a relative uncertainty of 6.6 × 10−12. It is one of the most
accurate fundamental constants to date. A careful analysis shows that knowledge of
the electrical size of the proton is nowadays a limitation in this comparison. The
aim of muonic hydrogen spectroscopy was to obtain an accurate value of the proton
charge radius. However, the value deduced from this experiment contradicts other less
accurate determinations. This problem is known as the proton radius puzzle. This new
determination of the proton radius may affect the value of the Rydberg constant R∞.
This constant is related to many fundamental constants; in particular, R∞ links the two
possible ways proposed for the redefinition of the kilogram, the Avogadro constant NA
and the Planck constant h. However, the current relative uncertainty on the experimental
determinations of NA or h is three orders of magnitude larger than the ‘possible’ shift of
the Rydberg constant, which may be shown by the new value of the size of the proton
radius determined from muonic hydrogen. The proton radius puzzle will not interfere in
the redefinition of the kilogram. After a short introduction to the properties of the proton,
we will describe the muonic hydrogen experiment. There is intense theoretical activity as
a result of our observation. A brief summary of possible theoretical explanations at the
date of writing of the paper will be given. The contribution of the proton radius puzzle
to the redefinition of SI-based units will then be examined."
end of PDF quote.
Anyway, I've analyzed ALL of the constants discussed here, including a new possible Avogadro's constant, all based on a mathematical analysis where the reduced mass assumption is not made, and apriori, a derivation of the proton to electron mass ratio based upon the proton radius, resulting in a Full Rydberg polynomial whose roots (solutions) are the 8-10 fundamental physics constants and they can be calculated to any precision desired. These are the ideal theoretical values based upon simultaneous solution of a single electron hydrogen atom Bohr & Schrรถdinger models are equivalent at lowest energy. 0K.
It's just a matter of time before I have The Oracle TOPPCG* - Top Physics Constant Generator in an Excel macro spreadsheet with capability to lock constants to golden fixed values and fine tune the others... ...and I think others will be interested in this precise solution.
 |
| Excel macro spreadsheet - user can fix golden values iterate to others of 8-10 fundamental constants. |
*awaiting peer review and verification, convergence is stable. I've had this solution for about 30 years.
More from the end of the PDF:
"Nevertheless, finding the solution of the proton radius puzzle would be a step in the long quest to decode the hydrogen spectrum: the ‘Rosetta stone of modern physics’ [75]"
[75]:
75 Hรคnsch, T. W., Schawlow, A. L. & Series, G. W. 1979 The spectrum of atomic Hydrogen. Sci.
Am. 240, 94–111. (doi:10.1038/scientific american 0379-94)
The Spectrum of Atomic Hydrogen
When I calculated the -4% error of the NIST/CODATA proton radius circa 1991, i shelved my work until data came out to verify the -4% error, i.e., the proton radius puzzle. Resumed in 2014.
ReplyDeleteI pretty much already had the answer back in 1978, just had to learn enough physics to clearly explain what the problem was. Originally, it seemed enough just to give the solution/answer, however, I have found spoon feeding works best.
ReplyDelete(this does point directly to Haramein's holographic solution - it takes his proton radius solution, avoids using the reduced mass assumption, and derives the Full Rydberg polynomial. This polynomial is the inter-relationship of the constants, the quantum mechanics solution to the constant's interrelationship.)
ReplyDeleteFull time funding, and I could have had this done, by myself, 8 years ago...
ReplyDeleteI wonder how much money they've spent to get an idea of these constant's values when someone can just run a numerical method to generate them? Billions of dollars?
ReplyDelete