Google+ Followers

Friday, December 15, 2017

Proton Reference

By Geek3 - Own work; created with hydrogen 1.0, CC BY-SA 3.0,

Reading over the history of the hydrogen atom and it's relationship to the foundation of quantum mechanics looks pretty sketchy compared to a more careful analysis.

More wholly:
$$F\left(x,\cdots,x_n\right)\equiv1\equiv{m_e}{e^4\over8c\epsilon_0^2h^3R_H}-{{\pi r_pcm_e}\over2h}$$
$x_4=h=$ Planck's constant
$x_3=\epsilon_0=$ Permittivity of vacuum
$x_2=c=$ Speed of light
$x_1=e=$ elementary charge

other useful constants and relationships:

$m_pr_p={2h\over{\pi c}}=4\ell m_{\ell}\;(Haramein's\;Equation)$

A 4th order 7D polynomial, solved for roots using numerical method:

The Surfer, OM-IV

Monday, December 11, 2017

Rep Adam Schiff is Passionate About Science!

Rep Adam Schiff's performance next. 


Friday, December 8, 2017

Clowns Popped Out of Pandora's Box!

Clowns popping out of The Box!

Negentropy - you can't keep a good clown down!

(place holder)

The Surfer, OM-IV

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

Maxwell is Always Lurking in the Background


The Surfer, OM-IV

Saturday, December 2, 2017

N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang–Mills theory

"It can be thought of as the most symmetric field theory that does not involve gravity."
Since we are coming from original principle and fundamental constants to investigate matter, our "postulates" (to be formalized later) which have been accumulating, however, are "mysterious" in that we discovered them yet have no reason for them yet:
  1. N=4 is the proton solution
  2. There is only one force field, and that is electromagnetism (4 fundamental forces of Nature are reduced to One)
  3. Geometric nature of structure of vacuum 

At least these three reasons are valid reasons for investigating N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory.

There's only a handful of concepts and definitions required to navigate through the ignorant gatekeepers who engage in the losing end of game theory.

Step by step we expose the errors and the error makers...
The Surfer, OM-IV 
(real physics is done in the spirit of surfing)

Friday, December 1, 2017

Chuck Norris Jokes


The idea behind the Chuck Norris jokes, and one of the things that makes them really fun and funny is that the punchline always has Chuck Norris in a superlative position.  I.,e., Chuck Norris CAN divide by zero!
signed:  Chuck Norris

Chuck Norris doesn't run for cover, he IS the cover!

Return to The Republic.

Nature itself is rising

The Future of Western Science

Present western cabal funded science one day will be a footnote in a child's book. 

Thursday, November 30, 2017

US Marshalls - Restoring the Republic

Silver Surfer #1

At the end of the first Silver Surfer movie, the Earth was saved.  

Our #1 Alliance member is about to come back. 

Stay tuned. 


The Surfer

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

The Standard Model - A Rube Goldberg machine


Owl|Y is laughing at you.

The Surfer, OM-IV

Monday, November 27, 2017

QFT - Quantum Field Theory - Effective Field Theories

Quantum field theory is an effective field theory, which is an approximation.  It uses the Hamiltonian with the reduced mass concept, so, clearly is an approximation.

The diagram above, a Feynman diagram is a way to diagrammatically show particle interactions - it's a way of encoding the equations or interactions (pictorial representations of the mathematical expressions - in this reduced mass or reductionist theory). 

Anyway, all of these field theories that make up QFT are these various effective field theories (QED, QCD) all of which are approximations.  These are experimental fields, empirical sciences, empirical theories.  

A collection of ideas, such as Tom Campbell's big TOE is more likely reality.

It, however, does not matter what mainstream science does, for it will be snatched from their hands, because consciousness is where it's going.  No matter what, consciousness, the key, will emerge as a significant aspect of scientific inquiry, and the next theories will emerge making this materialistic era look like nonsense.

It really doesn't take much of an argument to see what is going on and why these reductionist/isolationist ideas end in so many paradoxes, puzzles, and unsolved mysteries.  Simply examine the error term, which is firmly set by the reduced mass assumption, that allows these "theories" to be formulated in such a way as to design experiments.  

And nearly all of the experiments work and agree with the theory, except there are cracks, paradoxes, proton radius puzzles, and many other problems appearing (dark matter, dark energy from a related field) that are not adequately addressed and the theory cannot explain. Those are the things that come along with the approximation!  Look at the error term! It's negative! No wonder all kinds of craziness and unusual prediction/talk comes out of these effective field theory fields.  (reduced mass, $m_r$ is less than either the proton or electron mass, so they claim an 
$$m_r\ll m_p$$
"effective mass" of some mythical particle, $m_r$, behaves like the electron (this is the bad assumption, assuming $m_r{\color{red}\equiv}m_e$ IS the electron, however, experimentally, it looks like the electron).  The electron is but a wisp, or vortex in the aether, one that dances with its partner the proton.  

All we know for sure is the atom (elements). All ordinary matter are made of atoms which we think  are made of protons, neutrons, and electrons.  The protons are stable dual-toroidal like vortexes in the aether, 1836.15267 time the mass of the electron.  So, while the electron and its dynamics account for the large majority of interactions, these reductionist effective field theories are simply technological fields, not equipped to handle the fundamental investigation into the question of what is matter.  However, key thing is that the data from those experiments is useful in moving along to the true behavior of Nature.

They are all approximations.

Yet these theories are VERY accurate for what they were intended.  

So what is matter?  That is the question.  And all of the data from these experimental sciences can be used as data points, as they were intended, to piece together the bigger picture of what is matter.

So the apparent insanity serves a purpose for those with eyes to see.

(oh, and with mathematical insight.  If this 8D polynomial truly is a way to determine the masses and constants, well, then, once that is proven, simply move on to the next step of solving the problem.  No reason to wait for the idiots wasting billions of dollars while consuming humanity and Nature in the process).

The Surfer, OM-IV

A Study in Insanity - The Standard Model #1

It is clear that The Standard Model is an effective field theory that is an approximation to Nature and it is an approximation and has value since experiments can be done to compare "theory to experiment.  

In context, when carefully analyzed, it can be shown that the standard model is not a theory, it is an experimental science and technology.  It is a limit, an approximation to a theory of Nature.

This series of post will demonstrate via logical discussion in a scientific and mathematical and reasonable man standard, that The Standard Model is an experimental technical science intended to be a step along the way of better understanding Nature.

This is well known by most reasonable humans, however, then, why no progress?

It will become clear that The Standard Model is a study in insanity.

The Surfer, OM-IV

Sunday, November 26, 2017

Erwin Schrödinger - Who was he?

From (page 28, 1st ed., 1980,1987):
In 1926, Erwin Schrödinger modified the general wave equation to apply to single particles.
Erwin Schrödinger was not a lazy man laying in a bathtub dreaming up equations, he worked very hard to achieved Habilitation (venia legendi) by 1914 (Or did he?).  Or was he?

This modification and it's postulates, reducing the general wave equation to apply to single particles , converted the general wave equation to an approximation, the Schrödinger equation, which is used for the foundation of many experimental and technological fields. All approximations that work well within experimental error (experimental error masks theoretical error).

Thus shut up and calculate.

Thus, super computers are needed to solve the equations.

Likely, since there is so much fighting over how to "science" and whoever controls funding wants to keep it this way, and the point is so subtle yet so huge, it has taken up until now to bring a little light to the situation.

The General Wave equation derivation is an approximation already - having to do with concepts of linear vs. non-linear systems and validity of superposition or summing momenta, and other details.  In the general case, momenta do not sum just like velocities do not add (in special and general relativity?), so a modification combined with postulates, is an approximation and misses the behavior of the whole. So, a modification to an approximation is the Schrödinger equation.  Nice work fellas.

This is at the root of the problem with Western science - reductionism and isolated systems.  This is not an accurate way to model Nature.

(but it works good for technology, AI, singularity, while abusing Nature)

The Surfer, OM-IV
Focus on reality, not the shadow.