This excel screen snapshot shows the optimum value for the proton radius is 0.8412fm, Haramein's proton prediction and the 2010 & 2013 muonic hydrogen proton radius measurements.

The CODATA value, 0.8768fm is sadly in error... implying the standard model tools fail.

- Course Outline / PowerPoint announced for FractalU.com "

In this course we will be reviewing solutions to advanced physics problems using Nassim Haramein’s work and showing the simplicity of the approach. Using a simple geometric and information theory approach, assuming a constant density of the vacuum, we will solve for the black hole mass-radius relationship, the proton mass, the proton radius puzzle, and present a few new precise equations for the proton to electron mass ratio and Avogadro’s constant.

We will relate this to sacred geometry and Dan Winter’s phi ratio and discuss the importance of this material and the implications to this new way of thinking about the vacuum – the fabric of space-time.

Outline • Vacuum energy • Haramein’s PSU • Link to sacred geometry and Dan Winter’s phi ratio equation • Density of the vacuum • Ether – superfluid • Implications • Connectedness • What is mass? • Richard Feynman’s comments • Importance • CERN LHC IS attempting to answer with Higgs bozon • What problems can be solved using this approach? • Black hole mass, radius • Proton mass, radius • Proton radius puzzle • Dan Winter’s ionized hydrogen radius equation • Proton to electron mass ratio – precise equation • How this supports Haramein’s proton radius prediction • Relates 6 fundamental constants • Avogadro’s constant • Summary • Implications of this approach • Different way of thinking • New worldview

Using Haramein's proton radius equation (the one that predicted the muonic hydrogen proton radius) and the equation we derived in this blog for $\mu={m_p\over m_e}$, we can derived an expression for Avogadro's Constant which is even more accurate than the mainstream value:

It is also a new way to calculate $\pi:$
$$\pi={{\alpha^2 m_e}\over{r_pR_Hm_p}}={{\alpha^2 m_e}\over{4\ell m_{\ell}R_H}}$$
$\alpha=fine\;structure\;constant$
$m_e=mass\;of\;electron$
$m_p=mass\;of\;proton$
$r_p=2010\;and\;2013\;muonic\;hydrogen\;proton\;radius\;(Haramein's\;Equation)$
$R_H=Rydberg\;constant$
$m_pr_p=4\ell m_{\ell}\;(Haramein's\;Equation)$
$\ell=Planck\;Length$
$m_{\ell}=Planck\;Mass$

Six (6) fundamental constants related in ONE equation. Bazinga! Can you beat that?

It is also a new way to calculate $\pi:$
$$\pi={{\alpha^2 m_e}\over{r_pR_Hm_p}}={{\alpha^2 m_e}\over{4\ell m_{\ell}R_H}}$$
$\alpha=fine\;structure\;constant$
$m_e=mass\;of\;electron$
$m_p=mass\;of\;proton$
$r_p=2010\;and\;2013\;muonic\;hydrogen\;proton\;radius\;(Haramein's\;Equation)$
$R_H=Rydberg\;constant$
$m_pr_p=4\ell m_{\ell}\;(Haramein's\;Equation)$
$\ell=Planck\;Length$
$m_{\ell}=Planck\;Mass$

It is very significant to note that the EXACT muonic proton radius from 2010 & 2013 is needed in the equation for $\mu$, the proton to electron mass ratio, and the Planck mass to proton mass ratio (Haramein's equation).

Exactly how significant???? It is like a razor, in the denominator. If $r_p$ is off by 4%, then $1836.15267\dots$ is off by nearly 4%, ${1\over{1-x}}\approx{1+x}$.

While the mainstream physics community waits for the new experiments, we can simply review these equations from this post: http://phxmarker.blogspot.com/2015/06/mprp4lmreme-source-of-mass-of-matter.html and see that the measurements REQUIRE the proton radius to be the muonic radius from 2010 & 2013 to make the $\mu=1836.15267$ be right on (as well as make Haramein's equation correct in its prediction of the muonic proton radius).

This is serious stuff. It's time to move forward and see where this takes us rather than wait another few decades on the lamestream...

$\pi r_p = Arc\;Length$, this also is significant to note. When angles are measured in radians ($2\pi\;radians = 360\;degrees$), the arc length subtended by a radius is simply the product of the radius and the angle. Could this be the Arc of the Covenant knowledge required to tap into energy of the vacuum?

Galactic Duck says "You put yourself up on quite a pedestal there PEZ!"

It won't be long now before we join forces with Ancient Eqyptian and finally meet Bozon T. Clown!!! What possibly could Bozon T. have to say at this point? And what DOES the T. stand for?

Unraveling every riddle, Egyptian Duck is at the top of the heap, or he should be. Please help Egyptian Duck to the top of popular post page for a special post!

Note significantly $\varphi$, thegolden ratio., is all over the Platonic solids.

Considering that $\varphi$, the Golden ratio has been shown by many to be fractally embedded in all of Nature, Dan Winter's work is significanlty taking off where the ancients left off and giving meaning to:

WHERE IS PEZ THE DUCK? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Search for PEZ in this blog and bring him up the chain of posts to meet Bozon T. and his other Duck Family members!!!

Where does this equation come from? From the mind of a genius, Dan Winter. Upon further analysis, since things in Nature unfold from an embedded fractal of the golden mean ratio, $\Phi$, it is clear Dan is on the right path, AND THE ONLY PATH to function coherently with and within Nature.

This next comment requires further evaluation, however, it looks like Dan's equation IS the one key solution to Dirac's equation that allows for gravity, life, etc. Dirac's equation is a relativistic form of the Schrodinger wave equation. These are key quantum mechanical equations that explain information about matter on very small scales, and in some limit or another will approach macroscopic behavior. This is significant key work Dan has been doing and it will soon be linked to mainstream science, if this step has not already done so. A few more hours to review....

Bloch Wave Functions are solutions to SchrΓΆdinger's equation in a periodic crystal (solid-state work, what I do for a living - analog design and the physics behind the devices). I'm going to look at these next, and phase conjugate equations of this form and do some free-styling and comparing to Dan Winter's work...

This outline (see PDF link below) is perhaps the best yet at going over what the Delegate Level One program has to offer - it ain't just about physics. As a matter of fact, it redefines it all, and brings back into consciousness our ancient origins and much, much more.

Haramein's equation, with no competing interest:
$$M_PR_P=4 L M$$
(one form of a few)
add to it $M_ER_E$:
$$M_PR_P=4 L M=M_ER_E$$
using The Answers.

Confused / puzzled?

It's all about torque, spin, and balance:

"back of the hand balance..."

By including the whole, looking at proton and electron at same time, progress can be made.

I'll be looking at SchrΓΆdinger's wave equation, Dirac's relativistic version, and more to analyze in detail each wave funtion, and put legs on this theory.

From $M_PR_p=4LM=M_ER_E$ we can solve for the "electron radius" to determine the arc length.

Since this is simply an extension to basic pre-existing quantum mechanics, there is no need to reformulate or revisit all of quantum mechanics - that exercise is left up to the reviewer.

This equation can be solved to get $R_E$ or we can use and earlier post get get the expression for $R_E$ I developed in 1987-1991: The Answers

$$R_E={\alpha^2\over \pi R_H}$$

Since we are dealing presently with mono-protonic situations (single proton hydrogen in a low energy, non-ionized, unperturbed state) $R_H$ is used rather than $R_{\infty}$.

What is this electron radius and why is it so huge? From the equation

$$M_PR_P=4LM=M_ER_E$$

one can see that the torque / spin of the proton is matched by the electron - for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, and the length is such that the product of the electron radius and the electrom mass EQUALS the same 4LM (Haramein's $M_PR_P=4LM$ equation where

$M_P=Mass\;of\;Proton$

$R_P=Radius\;of\;Proton$

$L=Planck\;Length$

$M=Planck\;Mass$

$M_E=Mass\;of\;Electron$

$R_E=Radius\;of\;Electron$

.

.

.

and this balances both the electron and proton to a mass ratio of

Arc length, when dealing with radians, is simply the product of the radius and the angle subtended. Since we are doing the electron for 180 degrees, or $\pi$ radians: $S=\pi Radius$