The Electron Magnetic Moment - (or Eureka! 123)

  

An electrostatic ""analog*"" for a magnetic moment: two opposing charges separated by a finite distance.

The Dirac theory is not necessary to explain the g-factor for the electron. The deviation of the electron g-factor from that of the rigid sphere can be readily explained assuming that the charge distribution inside electron is different from the mass distribution.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_moment

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr_magneton

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_magnetic_moment

The field's wide open, easy pickings.  Easy as 123:

1. Step
2. by step
3. The old fashioned way

For inquires (concerning opportunities in unsolved physics problems), send email to 123@mail.house.gov

* I AM an analog designer and the best science never uses analogs to describe a phenomena, it focuses on the phenomena itself and not an analog(i.e., the analog of water flowing through a pipe for electrical current flow is a very limited analog (model) of current flow and electromegnetism).  Do you see how many steps these clownz got away from the ACTUAL phenomena?  Is it 1, 2, or 3 steps?

The Surfer, OM-IV

Happy Black Friday!

Ω