Donate your spare bitcoin today if this polynomial has any value to you!
Wednesday, March 27, 2024
Sunday, March 17, 2024
NMR Imaging Works Best Tuned Off Peak - Larmor Frequency of Hydrogen
If, as I've read, NMR Imaging Works Best Tuned Off Peak, then the (peak) Larmor Frequency of Hydrogen data can be obtained from NMR calibration data. To tune off peak, the peak measurements have to be made and would be in the calibration data. This is another quick way to verify the proton radius equation and the validity of the approach.
Here is a link to the post where I calculate/predict the expected Larmor frequency of hydrogen:
muh prediction (thus M*A*S*H 4077):
$$f_{\mathscr{L}}=40.7(7)\,{MHz/T}$$
mainstream theory:
$$f_{\mathscr{L}}=42.6\,{MHz/T}$$
Come in Tokyo, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, ¿Quรฉ? is the frequency:
Monday, March 4, 2024
Predictions (Trends) of Updates to Fundamental Physics Constants
What would it mean if the updates to the constants matches the trend predicted each time NIST/CODATA does an update?
Trend Prediction posts:
- https://phxmarker.blogspot.com/2022/05/trends-past-and-future-fundamental.html
- https://phxmarker.blogspot.com/2023/05/proton-mass-prediction-proton-should-be.html
I'll revisit the updates/trends and post a more clear table of past, present, and future values, keeping in mind that some are held "constant" to a value set by "decree" (law). Which is ok because a timebase/reference is needed anyway, so something has to be fixed because of no ABSOLUTE VALUE TIME reference.
Does Vegas take bets on trends of physics constants updates?
https://gettrumpsneakers.com/products/gold-sneaker |
Thursday, January 25, 2024
Nobel Prize Buster* in the Works!
It’s Kid Dynamite!
Moar later!
“Kek of Dynamite”
I'm thinking about solving for $R_H$ using the quadratic equation. Wolfram or some other symbolic solver such as MAPLE could solve it too. This will be the new Rydberg constant definition. What this failure of the mainstream science reminds me is of the novice in physics, chemistry, engineering or whatever using a limited viewpoint assumes a relationship is linear, like the original Rydberg equation however in fact it is a quadratic relationship, a power of two, thus a square root is involved in getting the answer.$${R_H = \frac{{ - b \pm \sqrt {b^2 - 4ac} }}{{2a}}}$$
This post/comment is a continuation of 9/11/2022's post:
I'll work out what a, b, and c are later, all using:
Notice multiplying both sides gives a polynomial power of two for $R_H$. |
Monday, January 22, 2024
Mach 105 - The Speed Limit of Sound
Mach 105 - The Speed Limit of Sound
(Assuming the speed of light is a constant $c$)
https://freespoke.com/search/images?q=105+arm+patch |
My intuition says the ideal theoretical* top speed capability of a conventional chemical rocket would be Mach 105. Any rocket scientists out there with a top speed calculation of your rockets? Rocketman?
*actual physical speed may be a factor of 2 or some multiple less due to practical realities
Monday, January 1, 2024
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)