Sunday, February 4, 2018

Solid-State Electronics - Device Designer


 Some say solid-state electronics, microchips, came from UFO crashes.  There is also a storyline that ties the development of solid-state electronics to the development of quantum mechanics and radio and physics and electronic components.

Some of the earliest detectors were diode detectors made of the cat whisker components.  Two dissimilar metals or material (crystals) can be doped or naturally have a tendencies for mixed with other nano materials, to create a p or n type material, and the junction of a p-type and n-type material is a diode  (3-5 vs 4).

So, in the 80s, the holy grail of the device researchers was the blue diode, the blue laser diode.  Now they even have purple.

Memsistor was the supposed missing 4th element.

So, why does is seem all so static, all so controled?

NSF grant to develop 5G and phase array antenna or micro array antennas...??? when anyone could do it???  WTF???  Corporate fascism is beign exposed...  the micro-code and companion co-processors riding above are really not so invisible....

more later... ramblings...

(minor 



The Surfer, OM-IV
(©️2018 Mark Eric Rohrbaugh & Lyz Starwalker)
The Surfer, OM-IV

Q

Saturday, February 3, 2018

Patent Games

https://tinyurl.com/yc54h8pw





electron mass error = click here if you dare. DDD

http://www.chegg.com/homework-help/rydberg-constant-equation-two-terms-vary-depending-species-c-chapter-2-problem-7p-solution-9780321917799-exc

UPDATE! JAN. 16, 2018
ETHERNET ENGINEERS—WHISTLEBLOW!
IEEE 803.2 Ethernet standard
Most computer engineers have no idea how the IEEE 802.3 data transmission Ethernet standard was developed (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). We have just discovered that it was shoved down our throats by Deep State shadow government forces intent on controlling the Internet as a global spy grid and corporatist profit machine. Richard C. Walker a.k.a Rick Walker was a stooge for Agilent Technologies who was evidently tapped by the Highlands Group to seize control of technology standards needed for the takeover. This post contains hard, indictable evidence that proves the identities of the corporatists involved with HP/Agilent, including 3Com, Qualcomm, Broadcom, Cisco, IBM, Sun, Intel, NTT (Japan Telephone), Cielo, Quake, nSerial, Nortel, World Wide Packets. See Jul. 10, 2000 IEEE meeting slides where Walker’s pushes standards proposed on Mar. 06, 2000—the same day he filed for a patent (became U.S. Pat. No. 6,718,491) on the same slides. Mindspring engineer Roy Bynum complained that Walker was railroading the standard. Of course, after filing his patent, Walker had a vested interest in having it become the IEEE standard for data transmission. It did, to this day.
xπŸ‘Œ
uuu

Thursday, February 1, 2018

Test Image


A post shared by Mark Rohrbaugh (@phxmarker) on

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

Compare these Two Equations for The (Fine-Structure Constant) ^{-1}

 

  1. NIST/CODATA \alpha (Fine-Structure Consntant)^-1=137.035999138
  2. PhxMarkER's (Fine-Structure Constant)^{-1}=137.073329


The Surfer, OM-IV
(©️2018 Mark Eric Rohrbaugh & Lyz Starwalker)
The Surfer, OM-IV

Q

Friday, January 26, 2018

✨New Equation For The Fine Structure Constant - Rough Draft#1 - Updated!



 



$$F\left(x,\cdots,x_n\right)\equiv1\equiv{m_e}{e^4\over8c\epsilon_0^2h^3R_H}-{{\pi r_pcm_e}\over2h}$$
$$m_e={2R_\infty h\over c\alpha^2}$$
$${1\over\alpha^2}={4c^2\epsilon_0^2h^2\over e^4-4\pi r_pc^2h^2R_H}$$
$${1\over\alpha}=\alpha^{-1}=\sqrt{{4c^2\epsilon_0^2h^2\over e^4-4\pi r_pc^2h^2R_H}}$$
$$\alpha^{-1}={e^4-4\pi r_pc^2h^2R_H\over4c^2\epsilon_0^2h^2}$$


Google Calculator Check of new equation   = 137.073329
(fine-structure constant)^{-1}                       = 137.035999138  NIST/CODAT/built-in constant

5 digit accuracy!  at least!!!

more later in follow up posts.

Mark Rohrbaugh

https://phxmarker.blogspot.com It was Mahatma Ghandi who said "A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members."...
The Surfer, OM-IV
(©️2018 Mark Eric Rohrbaugh & Lyz Starwalker)
The Surfer, OM-IV

Q

πŸ₯‡Exact Equation (EE) For The Mass of the Electron - (This is πŸ†NobelπŸ† πŸŽ–️prizeπŸ… stuff!!! πŸ†πŸ•΄️πŸ₯‡)



$$F\left(x,\cdots,x_n\right)\equiv1\equiv{m_e}{e^4\over8c\epsilon_0^2h^3R_H}-{{\pi r_pcm_e}\over2h}$$

Exact equation (EE) for the mass of the electron:
$${1\over{m_e}}\equiv{e^4\over8c\epsilon_0^2h^3R_H}-{{\pi r_pc}\over2h}$$
$${m_e}\equiv{1\over{e^4\over8c\epsilon_0^2h^3R_H}-{{\pi r_pc}\over2h}}$$
$${m_e}\equiv{{8c\epsilon_0^2h^3R_H}\times{2h}\over{e^42h}-{8c\epsilon_0^2h^3R_H}{\pi r_pc}}$$
$${m_e}\equiv{{8c\epsilon_0^2h^3R_H}\over{e^4}-{4c^2\epsilon_0^2h^2R_H}{\pi r_p}}$$

$\epsilon_0= electric\;constant$
$h = Planck's\;Constant$
$e=elementary\;charge$
$R_H=Rydberg\;constant\;for\;the\;_1^1Hydrogen\;atom$
$\pi= 3.14159265...$
$r_p= proton\;radius$


Google Calculator Check
(thanks, Google, for working this out for me while I now go to work!!!)
calculation for electron mass - check ✔️✔️✔️
(The interesting thing about Gooogle Calculator is it only gives an answer when the untis are consistently correct! So, GooG is a check of sorts.)

Compare to Wikipedia's electron rest mass (mainstream, western, cabal):
$$m_e={2R_\infty h\over c\alpha^2}$$

Electron_Mass / m_e = 1.00054489 
((8 * c * (electric constant^2) * (h^3) * Rydberg constant) / ((elementary charge^4) - (4 * (c^2) * (electric constant^2) * (h^2) * Rydberg constant * pi * (0.841199715091e-15 m)))) / m_e =
1.00054489 <~~~ need to use re-calc'd constants, for a later paper/post... using The Oracle's computed algorythmically constants!!! 


The Surfer, OM-IV
(©️2018 Mark Eric Rohrbaugh & Lyz Starwalker)
The Surfer, OM-IV

Q

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Academia - Proton to Electron Mass Ratio Draft Publication

 https://www.academia.edu/s/4d3a219b70/proton-to-electron-mass-ratio-equation?source=link









































 https://www.academia.edu/s/4d3a219b70/proton-to-electron-mass-ratio-equation?source=link

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Postulates Are Key - What Key? - 432, The Verdi pitch standard of 432 = 2*2*2*2*3*3*3

The Brown Note

"With a Verdi pitch standard of 432 = 2*2*2*2*3*3*3, in just tuning all octaves (factor 2), perfect fourths (factor 4/3) and fifths (factor 3/2) will have pitch frequencies of integer numbers, but not the major thirds (factor 5/4) nor major sixths (factor 5/3) which have a prime factor 5 in their ratios. However scientific tuning implies an equal temperament tuning where the frequency ratio between each half tone in the scale is the same, being the 12th root of 2 (a factor of ca. 1.059463), which is not a rational number: therefore in scientific pitch only the octaves of C have a frequency of a whole number in Hertz."
 The Surfer, OM-IV
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use#U.S._fair_use_factors                   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use                                      

Q

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

Link for PDF of proton radius problem

https://plus.google.com/103725077496823758319/posts/dt4YaP7Qwmr

Link for PDF of proton radius problem.  Embed in ifrsme here later.  


Old article.  



Repeat.  







Additional Credentials: Street Cred!