What is a cargo cult and who / where are they today?
Are you waiting on the sidelines for scientific development?
Have you rescinded your responsibility to understand and comprehend the nature within you and without you?
Do you understand how the products and services you use work?
Or is that someone else's responsibility?
You see now why change is met with ridicule, violent opposition, then accepted as obvious, AFTER MUCH damage and destruction have already been done. It requires much effort on every individual.
The Who - Who Are You?
It is a responsibility AND a right, to pursue scientific truth.
SO, while CERN, DoE, NSF, NASA, etc, has hijacked ""science"" to focus on technology rather than the way Nature truly behaves, it is up to the rest of us to carry on.
United States Postal ServiceThe iconic 20th century physicist Richard Feynman invented a method for calculating probabilities of particle interactions using depictions of all the different ways an interaction could occur. Examples of “Feynman diagrams” were included on a 2005 postage stamp honoring Feynman.
Richard Feynman is my favorite physicist (living: Susskind). There is A LOT to learn from Richard Feynman. There's a few things he is known for, and he is definitely a helper and a logical positivist.
The cargo cult science concept and many other ideas he wrote about and talked about help to elucidate much of the physical, technical world.
Where we can learn most from Feynman, after knowing how to solve every problem that has ever been solved, is from where he failed, from where he was most ineffective EVEN considering his great intellect, position(s), etc. He failed in getting school books improved and failed at making any great strides in biology.
Those two areas alone could be written serious chapters in the history of the development of the unified physics.
There's much more one could say about Feynman, however, the main point here is that Feynman hit certain walls, certain walls of resistance he wrote about in his books and pointed out in his many quotes (https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Richard_Feynman). Even Feynman was uncomfortable with the direction physics was taking. The writing is on the wall.
ALICE is joining Cinderella and both will be accompanying Dorothy for the next BIG CERN CELEBRATION. The party is getting bigger, the cast of players is getting longer and Leon is getting Larger!!!
This is due to a perception problem. Not only are we unaware of more than 24%, no 76%, no 99.999999999...% of the matter and energy in the universe, we are unaware of our own limited perception and belief systems. Even if one is aware of these limitations, then how does one perceive that which one does not have senses?
Every concept is part of a belief system, a summation of ALL that we have been taught, boiled, and stewed in. All is up for re-evaluation. An accounting MUST be made, a TOTAL accounting... a revisiting to the foundations, the founding assumptions.
The proton is vibrating into and out of the vacuum. A Feynman diagram of this would borrow some energy for the creation of an antiproton which annihilates the proton and uses part of the resultant energy to repay the borrowed energy and the remainder to recreate the proton.
This is a proton operated upon by an annihilation operator followed by a creation operator (standard QFT concepts). The borrowed energy for the antiproton can be considered traveling back in time to be present when needed.
Anyway, this is simple possibilities of how reality truly is. There is no reason to be stuck in a belief system of others TELLING you what their reality is, especially when it comes to important things, such as life, Nature, science, etc.
The technology speaks for itself.
So, one can see that within the immense density of the vacuum of spacetime there are equal amounts of matter and antimatter, as expected.
$$ln(M_P)=-ln(R_P)+C$$
$$-ln(R_P)=ln({1\over R_P})$$
$$ln(M_P)=ln({1\over R_P})+C$$
$$M_P={e^C\over R_P}$$
$${M_PR_P}=K^{[1]}$$ ∴ the mass.radius product of the proton is a constant $\therefore$ the proton does not decay.
There is no such thing as dark matter / dark energy - Rauscher-Haramein proved it with their extension to Einstein's field equations. There is no reason for the proton to decay, especially because a failed theory says it should decay to make everything consistent in those failed theories.
The BIG BANG has failed, SM has failed. It is time to move on.
${\partial M_P\over\partial t}=0$ due to no known observable mass change of the proton at rest
${\partial R_P\over\partial t}=0$ due to no known observable radius change of the proton at rest
4,L, & M being constants and derived from measured constants, ∴ the partial or change or derivative of a constant with respect to anything is zero$^{[2]}$. We will look into varying these constants later as others have done (varying the cosmological constant, G, c, $\Lambda$, etc, in an appropriate way).
[2] except for wrt itself ${\partial K \over \partial K}=1$
Clearly, the proton mass.radius product is a constant. It is a self-consistent, tautological, self-contained thing - the proton - a fractal representation of the whole AND compatible with our mathematics at this scale, at all scales. As above, so below.
Additional Supporting Derivations / proofs: (add details and diagrams) TO BE ADDED later
Add diagram for proton + (antiproton + proton) = proton
Add summation of energy-mass, conservation of energy-mass-information
the proton vibrates into and out of the vacuum teleporting itself from place to place
Clearly the mainstream physics viewpoint of the proton is not adequate for describing its nature. Another viewpoint or concept is needed to describe the behaviour and nature of the proton.
The genesis of the proton - how it is/was created in the first place. All of this has to be considered, as well as the future fate.
So, at this point, there are many proton structures to consider, many models to capture the protons essence, however, which one works to truly explain and predict the behavior of nature?
The wormhole connected proton of the unified physics...
(and there are a few other approaches to this problem we will be looking into)
Protons do not decay. Due to conservation of information, the Proton is a stable, persistent vortex like dynamic oscillating into and out of the vacuum.
"But the standard model, despite the glory of its vindication, is also a dead end. It offers no path forward to unite...
Posted by Mark Rohrbaugh on Sunday, June 7, 2015
The writing is on the wall. No super symmetry particles have been found nor will they be found, thus, opening the doorway to new physics.
Professor Kaku will have to start paying his dues again and earn his credentials, because all his credibility is lost. All bases belong to Haramein. He's been camping there for over 30 years waiting$^{[1]}$...
So, as you can see, there is no bother waiting for the end of the summer because #CERN #LHC is working on a failed theory, wasting billions of dollars and generations of minds.
[1] A special kind of "waiting". Imagine having 30+years to think and develop the ideas from this present consciousness of first awareness that the new physics is real and is not so new to Haramein and team of many others aware of this material... (a little side-note for those whom already know the unified physics and future readers: yes, it is like shooting fish in a barrel at this point, so forgive me...)
"Frame-dragging is an effect on spacetime, predicted by Einstein's general theory of relativity, that is due to non-static stationary distributions of mass–energy. A stationary field is one that is in a steady state, but the masses causing that field may be non-static, rotating for instance." (wikilink)
"May 4, 2011: Einstein was right again. There is a space-time vortex around Earth, and its shape precisely matches the predictions of Einstein's theory of gravity:"
A side thing to think about while reading this blog:
Civilization now revolves around economic desires rather than awareness and consciousness
Links to the holographic principle of physics:
(as well as a principle known as the correspondence theorem, which demonstrates the equivalence of 4D (spacetime) black holes to quantum entangled systems described in higher dimensions (another application of the holographic correspondence in physics):
The final resolution to the derivation of the proton radius.mass relationship depends upon the $2\eta \over R$ term of:
$$m_p={2\eta \over R}m_\ell$$
$\eta={A\over A_{\ell c}}$ <-- information theory argument (holographic principle and correspondence theorem - 4D spacetime can be represented on a 2D surface area of a black hole
As mentioned in an earlier post, $\eta$ and $R$ are large number ratios that were mentioned by early theorists as "items" of interest. Indeed, these large number ratios and Fibonacci/phi ratios (phi, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 12, 20, ...) and Platonic geomtries are significant in the development of the unified theory.
These links above, provide supporting information for the derivation of the eta term. Besides these arguments, a high-level review of the thinking that leads up to this work clearly indicates the predictive quality of this theory - an accuracy of the theory ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE PLANCK scale. And this theory is way more encompassing than these simple black hole and proton calculations.
So, in summary, Algebraic Form:
$$M_PR_P=4LM$$
$M_P=$ Mass of proton
$R_P=$ Radius of proton
$L=$ Planck Length
$M=$ Planck Mass
Geometric Form (Information Theory - IT):
$$m_p={2\eta \over R}m_\ell$$
$m_p=$ mass of proton
$\eta=$ ratio of proton surface area to equatorial cross-sectional area of Planck Spherical Unit (PSU)
$R=$ ratio of volume of proton to volume of PSU
$m_\ell=$ Planck mass
Clearly* the physics theory and approach outlined matches the data better than the mainstream theory matches the data on not only this proton radius problem, but also the approach works for MANY of the unsolved physics problems. It is just a matter of time for the mainstream to catch up or be left behind.
There is a lot more than one can say about these equations, however, the focus to complete this work also requires some different thinking:
David Frawley in his book Gods, Sages and Kings which deals with the Vedic culture in general but also covers the Seven Sages, proposed the highly intriguing idea that:
civilization back then did not revolve around economic desires and values,
but rather was ruled by the spiritual, and by a spiritual awareness and a harmony with the One, with nature, and with the cosmos.
