Sunday, April 19, 2015

A Little Deeper Look into the Quantum World




I first read Gรถdel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid  (GEB) in the early 80's while in college and learning to design microprocessors while co-oping at DEC in Hudson, Mass.  What I most remember about GEB is Kurt Gรถdel's The Incompleteness Theorem.  

Modern mainstream science is incomplete.  There are many unsolved problems and even the top physicists in the field admit they have serious concerns and there are many unanswered questions.

So, when it fails, The Standard Model, and CERN LHC will prove it fails soon, what's left? What's next? What other theory could possibly work to explain the way Nature truly behaves?

For the answer to that, Sherlock Holmes says:
How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth? (wikilink)
 What remains is the impossible, and that impossible is just what the main stream tells you:

Sci-Fi Science: Physics of the Impossible with  Dr Michio Kaku


He knows there are no limits to stupidity...


Dr Michio Kaku does a very good job of explaining the present state of science and technology and pointing towards a future set of possibilities.  One skilled in the latest of the unified physics can see while Kaku is optimistic about science's abilities, he in no way is aware of the physics and science behind some of future machines, such as anti-gravity and warp drive.  These things require a basic understanding of the fabric of spacetime, and Kaku makes that very clear he is not aware of the immense magnitude of the density of the vacuum energy. And that's OK, as I'm ignorant of much of his String Theory. 

About the best thing we can hope to come out of string theory is some sort of bridge from the old theory to the new.

So, really, what this post is about is, as we know, for the #LHC to examine things at higher and higher resolution requires higher and higher energies, and these higher energies are higher frequencies and shorter wavelengths.  A short wavelength is required to get fine resolution.These high energies tear things apart, protons, etc. 

So, what we are taking about is reductionism - taking the problem apart. Reducing it to smaller "handleable" problems. This approach ignores the whole, the interaction with the environment, and misses the essence of the problem and of life. 
Simply said, by tearing things apart to see what they're made of and what makes them tick misses and destroys the whole. The whole which provides the why, once understood.

This approach of #CERN #LHC has no end.  Just like the Koch zoom in above has no end, there is no limit to the insanity.

The Surfer, OM-IV

Friday, April 17, 2015

Basic Math Identities


$$1$$
$$1\;1$$
$$1\;2\;1$$
$$1\;3\;3\;1$$
$$1\;4\;6\;4\;1$$
$$1\;5\;10\;10\;5\;1$$
$$\vdots$$
$$1=1$$
Let $x=x$
$$\int e^x=f(u)^n$$
$$\pi r^{square?}\leftrightarrow Cornbread\,are\,square!$$

The Surfer, OM-IV

Upcoming: The Science vs. Religion Strawman Duality Arguement

Rupert Sheldrake - The Science Delusion: Why Materialism is not the Answer


This will be the start of a compassionate understanding review of Lawrence Krauss's and Richard Dawkins' "performances" on their "Science vs. Religion" duality strawman argument video(s).

As Sgt. Shultz might say "I know nothing, I see nothing", when in fact the contrary is true:

The present western mainstream scientific "reality" seems to be a limiting artificial mental construct that does not and cannot explain consciousness and a whole lot more.


The Surfer, OM-IV

Another Preview to: Derivation of MpRp=4LM #7


Fire in the Sky - Phoenix
This is where we are going, to understand the derivation of:
$$m_p={2 \eta \over R}m_l$$
which is the geometric form of $M_PR_P=4LM$.

A side note, before we go into why the form of the equation is 2 times the inverse of the equation for black holes $({2\eta\over R} vs. {R\over\eta})$.  This part of the derivation is very important to be able to bridge the idea of using a floating piece of the fabric of spacetime to calculate the mass.radius relationship of black holes as well as a proton by understanding perspective: are we weighing the water in the ocean or outside of the ocean (weighing matter in the vacuum of space, or weighing a region of space)?

For a cosmological scale black hole, the black hole mass can be considered as floating in the quantum foam like super-fluid vacuum of spacetime dynamic proven by the Casimir effect and the dynamic Casimir effect, as we did in an earlier post.

I'm going to analyze detective style Nassim's proton paper and give a summary in Derivation of MpRp=4LM #7 of the argument for these simple coefficients. The argument is deeply connected to the argument Leonard Susskind won against the Dark Lord Stephen Hawking about the information conservation and black holes that resulted in this holographic 3D spacetime being painted onto a 2D surface of a black hole kinda holofractalgraphic sort of thing.  Considering the theory behind this IS mainstream Einstein and Planck and all the greats, and it results in such simple and elegant form, just as Einstein, Feynman  and others used to say, simple geometric beauty in fundamental Planck units.
$$R={V\over V_l}$$
$$\eta={A\over A_{eq}}$$


Lecture 4 | New Revolutions in Particle Physics: Basic Concepts

The simplest (k=1?) scalar field in quantum field theory can be represented mathematically by:
$$\Psi=\sum_k  e^{+i k x}e^{-i \omega t}$$
$$\Psi^\dagger =\sum_k  e^{-i k x}e^{+i \omega t}$$
using Susskind's dagger $\dagger$ notation, and these represent the wave functions of the field of quantum field theory and certain sums can be considered to be a traveling wave or group wave with a group velocity and that can represent a type of moving particle.  And, the simplest form that is a solution to the equations is what is called a scalar field, and it turns out that the Higgs field is also a scalar field.
Higgs references: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalar_field_theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
"In the Standard Model, the Higgs particle is a boson with no spin, electric charge, or colour charge. It is also very unstable, decaying into other particles almost immediately. It is a quantum excitation of one of the four components of the Higgs field. The latter constitutes a scalar field"

I mention this, because the Higgs field, being a scalar field, can be represented by this:
$$\Psi=e^{+i k x}e^{-i \omega t}$$
$$\Psi^\dagger =e^{-i k x}e^{+i \omega t}$$

Looks very similar to phasor math.
"It is time for answers!"

Anyway, any way you look at it, this Higgs field implies an energy the permeates the entire fabric of spacetime in all directions.  This implies a sort of Aether.  The Planck scale quantum foam that is the bio crystalline fabric of spacetime is this new super-fluid Aether (super-fluid implying it conserves information).

The Surfer, OM-IV

Thursday, April 16, 2015

Quantum Entanglement - QE - Another Key (or "Spooky Action at a Distance")

Entangled Mesquite Tree

EPR_paper, a famous paper, is one of the first papers of Einstein's I recall being able to read and understand a point where Einstein was wrong, and Einstein got a lot of things wrong, like the rest of us, however, his theories continue to work to this day making our GPS system possible and much more.  Much much more is possible with an extension of Einstein's general theory of relativity as Elizabeth Rauscher and Nassim Haramein have done.

I didn't know Einstein was wrong in that famous paper, and his argument about "Spooky Action at a Distance" was flawed thinking, I was informed he was wrong by the work of many, however, more specifically by

  1. Bell's Inequality 1964  (Bell's Theorem)
  2. Shor's Algorithm 1994
  3. Many QE experiments
  4. Quantum Computer R & D (D-Wave etc)
The reason I mention quantum entanglement as another key is that considering Nature truly behaves in a quantum entangled way, it implies SOMETHING happens at a speed faster than light.

The mere fact that SOMETHING happens faster than the speed of light opens up the door for other possibilities that were and are not considered in a universe with a speed limit of  the speed of light, c.

Thus, quantum entanglement is a key phenomena to understand in our effort to comprehend the way Nature truly behaves.

The mainstream TV physicists might be able to claim they were very sick men, like Master Moe says in "Idiots Deluxe" - 1945.


The Surfer, OM-IV

Disconnected Dark Ages to "The Connected Universe"

Black and white horizontal flowering plant image.


Present mainstream science can be likened to the Dark Ages, a Disconnected Dark Ages.  Like this black & white photo, a disconnected universe, while beautiful, is incomplete - not whole, limited.

Whole new dimensions of information and understanding are added with a new worldview, the connected worldview.

To see what "The Connected Universe" is, what a connected worldview is, watch this short intro video:
,


Worldview is discussed and explained by David Bohm, a well known physicist:
7 minutes 34 seconds of AWESOMENESS!!!





More later,
The Surfer, OM-IV

Sunday, April 12, 2015

Rational Wiki Talk Page - Nassim Haramein - Sirius Science #2


The Dogon Nommo connection.  This is what is implied by "Sirius Science".  Look for yourself into the Dogon Nommo mystery. Revolutionary information. Rat Wiki.Rational wiki talk.

Not only is particle physics in the middle of a revolution, so is archeology, so is medicine and health, and biosciences, and consciousness, genetics, nearly every field is having a fundamental revolution.


You can find all the other revolutionary stuff using your own internet research discernment techniques.

A more useful thing is to have a list of useful YouTube Mainstream TV Scientists and TV Physicists
MR. Science

Stooge Science and Technology (SST)


The unlearning and relearning that's going to have to be done to fully comprehend the unified physics is awesome, yet doable once the awareness is there. So, watching some TV physicists and TV scientists, might as well go with the ones closer to reality experience.

The Surfer, OM-IV


Black Holes- Hawking Holes - What are they?


Looks like Hawking's about to get painted onto a 2D Surface Area $A_s$ of a Hawking Hole!

An incomplete theory, such as modern cosmology (The Big Bang Theory, The Standard Candle) and The Standard Model for the quantum world, leads to unusual propositions and vulgar conclusions.

"Hawking Holes", or the usual "black hole" is only part of the story. Recent findings have been proving Nassim Haramein's insightful research into the true behavior of Nature:




A lot more comes out of the black hole than Hawking radiation.  The true behavior of Nature is total conservation of information, conservation of total mass and energy and all information - nothing is lost.

Both of these papers provide and alternate view, that of a black hole - white hole dynamic

Using standard techniques, Nassim and team have answered the fundamental questions that now allow universal insight into understanding the behavior of nature.




The Surfer, OM-IV


Saturday, April 11, 2015

"unitarity triangle" and the nature and origin of CP violation

"unitarity triangle"  the nature and origin of CP violation, which is a difference in behaviour between matter and antimatter. 
Hmmm, now what could they be trying to say here MR Wizard?

Here's a list of things related and then we'll find out what this is all about:



This is simply to learn the lingo before getting to the bottom of this.  Is it getting too deep for The Surfer? 







We'll wrap this up by the end of summer, or at latest last quarter of 2015, however, we know apriori that the angles don't add up, the times/decays/delays don't match the theory, and all we are waiting for is CERN LHC to make the announcement later this year.

More problems:


The Surfer, OM-IV

Demystifying the Higgs Snow Job (Defining the Problem)




Prof. Matt Strassler disagrees with Prof. Susskind:




The ONE thing to look out for is this decay time from the Higgs to the gamma rays that the detector detects.

This is the key thing about the triangle-reaction: 
p - protons
g- gluons
t - quarks
H - Higgs Bozon (an excitement in the - - - Higgs Field - - -)
$\gamma$ - gamma rays (electromagnetic radiation, LIGHT)
So, if you follow this VERY closely, and see how much more complex a Higgs characterization is as compared to the proton radius measurement (using same theory, math, standard model), there is SERIOUS trouble ahead for the standard model.  Sirius Trouble...




The Surfer, OM-IV

Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Preview: Derivation of MpRp=4LM #7

Dynamic 3D Spacetime


Ok, I've been having a little too much fun lately, however, now it is time to get back to business.

And the business in hand is to IN ONE POST (Derivation of MpRp=4LM #7) to derive the mass.radius relatoinship for the proton using the density of the fabric of spacetime $D={6 \over \pi}{M \over L^3}=T$, and considering information theory as we have clearly stated AND demonstrated with the Surfer's previous failure which he promptly recovered from.

So, basically, after having some fun, now it is time to get back down to business.

Not only will we be going through the derivation of MpRp=4LM, the mass.radius relationship of the proton, we will be moving onto the Yukawa potential and quantum gravity unification theory - and showing how not only can we solve for black hole mass.radius relationship, proton mass.radius relationship, we will also derive a VERY accurate Yukawa potential, and discuss the resonance frequency of such things, and this theory agrees with the data!!!!

And, for those of you who already know, all of this has already been done in Nassim's papers:
Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass
Haramein, N. (2012). Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass, Physical Review & Research International, ISSN: 2231-1815, Page 270-292

What I am basically doing is blogging a peer review of Nassim's papers at a level anyone can understand.  He has already done the work, and I am going through the papers and verifying his work and pointing out the simplicity in his approach.

Nassim has been saying this for years, and finally he is being heard.

Good Surfing,
The Surfer, OM-IV