Tuesday, June 16, 2020

Planck's Constant, Some Take It Seriously



Stephan Schlamminger’s Planck constant tattoo is followed by the founding motto of the metric system: “For all times, for all people.”
https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/11/14/18072368/kilogram-kibble-redefine-weight-science

h = 6.62607015e-34   is alright, but what if it's:
h = 6.62577382e-34*  ??? and a fine tuning of all other constants to harmonize them.

Only a +0.0044723832% difference...
The Surfer, OM-IV

Monday, June 15, 2020

Is That You Talking, MR. Surfer, Or The Equations?

I AM the equation
I AM 1 with the equations

The Surfer, OM-IV

On the Mathematical Modeling of Physical Reality




On the Mathematical Modeling of Physical Reality:

"Calculus, in particular, led to accurate mathematical models for physical reality, first in the physical sciences and eventually in the other sciences, engineering, medicine, and business. These mathematical models are usually too complicated to be solved explicitly, and the effort to obtain approximate, but highly useful, solutions gave a major impetus to numerical analysis."
"One of the most important and influential of the early mathematical models in science was that given by Newton to describe the effect of gravity."
from: https://www.britannica.com/science/numerical-analysis/Historical-background
The better the model is, the more accurately it represents physical reality. When complete, the analysis of the model then involves measurement error, phenomena not included (example, 0 or first order models often ignore friction) which leads to comparing the theoretical model to reality, measurements error, precision of references and constants, it's all interrelated.

The best model so far for the atomic world is The Standard Model. From the equations that define the theory, define the model, relationships are defined.  These give insight such as relationships that become known as physical laws, like the law of gravitation for a given set of conditions.

So, a wave equation that describes precisely the quantized energy frequency relationship of the electron in an atom of hydrogen contains information about the system. If these terms are carried through to a full analysis, identities can be derived that in the full context of the full model define the interrelationship between all variables.

What if a relationship is found that defines the interrelation of the parameters that define the system? And it has a stable solution to its roots?
A solution that converges no many how many decimals places are targeted?
The statics and dynamics are included.
Maxwell's equations are included.
Boundary conditions are set by all known phenomena.

The equation IS the definition and interrelationship of the parameters that describe the system.

Therefore, the solution to that equation defines the values for that system.

Like the full Rydberg equation (including proton to electron mass ratio and proton radius).
(for a single hydrogen atom)

Thus, the constants and masses of the standard model can be defined mathematically.

As has been shown by this blog and The Oracle (beta 2) code.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egyptian_mathematics#Numerals

The Surfer, OM-IV

Thursday, May 14, 2020

CODATA/NIST Only Good to 4 Decimal Places

https://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?rp|search_for=Proton+radius

Billions of dollars spent and proton radius only good to 4 decimal places?

Likely only good to three...

Just solve the equation, the full Rydberg equation, for it's roots!


Wednesday, May 13, 2020

Quanta: What Goes On in a Proton? Quark Math Still Conflicts With Experiments.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/what-goes-on-in-a-proton-quark-math-still-conflicts-with-experiments-20200506/
Three particles moving closer together then farther apart. The region between them appears in green.

Thursday, April 30, 2020

All the Constants

How many people do you know talking about calculating a physical constant or mass? Just one?

Well, I got 'em all.  WWG1WGA


The Surfer, OM-IV
4:20

Friday, April 10, 2020

Q Related: 4 10 20 = D J T

FISA = Start
Q's about to get something on the scoreboard.

Armor_of_God.jpg
The world will soon understand.
Q

Thursday, March 26, 2020

Speed of Light Converging - Graph of Oracle Code Speed of Light Output

Speed of Light VS. Iteration Number
Speed of light according to Wikipedia is 299,792,458 m/s
(5,000 m/s per division, for about 15,000 m/s error out of about 300,000,000)

I always wanted to examine the coefficients as they converged.  Here is a rough look.  More details to come later.  Its nice to see a smooth convergence at this scale.  Not zoomed in enough to see detail.

Mainstream data is only good to 4 decimal places. 

Reference and definitions have to be made in mainstream, since they have no reference.

More later. Numerical analysis isn't that hard...

(This is from a run of the Oracle code modified to print the speed of light each iteration)
(the red line is marking the mainstream value, the yellow is The Oracle's value)



The Surfer, OM-IV

Sunday, November 10, 2019

Quantum mechanics gets stern challenge from single silicon ion

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/11/silicons-magnetic-properties-tests-quantum-mechanics-to-its-limits/





Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Nov. 8 2019

"The below is a summary of information from the Internet. It would be up to the individual reader to do their own research and decide whether or not it is valid." 





For fun:

Saturday, October 12, 2019

Wikipedia Says: Proton Radius Puzzle Solved

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_radius_puzzle

The proton radius puzzle was an unanswered problem in physics relating to the size of the proton.[1] Historically the proton radius was measured via two independent methods, which converged to a value of about 0.877 femtometres (1 fm = 10−15 m). This value was challenged by a 2010 experiment utilizing a third method, which produced a radius about 5% smaller than this, or 0.842 femtometres.[2] The discrepancy was resolved when research conducted by Hessel et al. confirmed the same radius for 'electronic' hydrogen as well as it's 'muonic' variant.[3]
So, they consider it resolved with no theory, no calculation that correlates with or predicts the proton radius.

🤡works.

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!


The Surfer, OM-IV

Friday, September 20, 2019

Whitehouse - Soon


https://qmap.pub/read/26