Predictions (Trends) of Updates to Fundamental Physics Constants

What would it mean if the updates to the constants matches the trend predicted each time NIST/CODATA does an update?

Trend Prediction posts:

1. https://phxmarker.blogspot.com/2022/05/trends-past-and-future-fundamental.html
   
2. https://phxmarker.blogspot.com/2023/05/proton-mass-prediction-proton-should-be.html
   

I'll revisit the updates/trends and post a more clear table of past, present, and future values, keeping in mind that some are held "constant" to a value set by "decree" (law). Which is ok because a timebase/reference is needed anyway, so something has to be fixed because  of no ABSOLUTE VALUE TIME reference.

Does Vegas take bets on trends of physics constants updates? 

https://gettrumpsneakers.com/products/gold-sneaker

Mr. Jackson, 1963
He was my high school chemistry teacher who first told our class about the proton to electron mass ratio term that was dropped from the Rydberg equation for Solid-State theory.  Way above our heads, he was just telling us 11th graders the last day of school the term they really shouldn't drop and if someone could come up with an equation for the proton to electron mass ratio they'd be famous. That was in the 70's, about 1978, when the Standard Model was being "finalized".

The Surfer, OM-IV (Ω4)

Ω