I AM what I AM.
Q
Thursday, February 15, 2018
Wednesday, February 14, 2018
Tuesday, February 13, 2018
Obama's #BootClub @MistaBRONCO #ObamaPortrait
The Obama's didn't seem to mind joining your #BootClub @MistaBRONCO. Looks just as happy as the day he armed our ISIS enemies. #obamaportrait pic.twitter.com/X4L1CTLCFq— Meme Chaos (@ExtinctMedia) February 12, 2018
SARAH SANDERS DROPS THE MIC
SARAH SANDERS DROPS THE MIC— ScottAnthony JUSTICE ⚖️🇺🇸 (@ScottAnthonyUSA) February 13, 2018
(@PressSec at White House Press Briefing)https://t.co/W89aQH2wK9 pic.twitter.com/flyr0no0ZK
.
The Surfer, OM-IV
Monday, February 12, 2018
Latest INTEL:
James Gilliland w/ Jordan Sather ~ The Taboo End of the Rabbit Hole The latest and most current INTEL:#GreatAwakening #UAP https://t.co/L4ZScJlUU1 via @YouTube— Mark (@AZGreenBelt) February 12, 2018
Sunday, February 11, 2018
Gravity 101 Post #3-Preview
The problem becomes calculating the net force between two shells of negative charge ($Q_{1{}-},Q_{2{}-}$), of radii $r_r, r_2$, separated by a distance $R_{12}$ and two positive point charges ($Q_{1{}+},Q_{2{}+}$). (positive and negative are bound, )***
Since $M_1\gg M_2$ and $r_1\gg r_2$, the polarity of the larger object is positive, and the net polarity of the smaller object is negative, thus overall attractive force, like gravity. Next, in this final post, The Surfer will quantify these details and show how gravity is an indirect (actually quite direct) electromagnetic phenomena.** (in far field. Will be presenting Maxwell's equations for the near, intermediate, and far fields showing exactly and approximations.
The larger mass has a net positive charge in the far field because the electron clouds because there is a finite probability that the electron cloud is on average farther away wrt to a far field observer - the electron shell , at least a half hemisphere is farther away than the central positive charge, thus, the electron cloud does not shield 100% the positive charge- by shield I mean cancel exactly. While the net charge is zero, there are residual forces, whose sum is zero. And the smaller mass has its electrons pulled slightly closer to the larger mass due to the net positive charge... much like the polar water molecule, yet more symmetric - average shield probabilities may result in a clean G derivation... TBD.
If this doesn't match Nature, the next approach will be to ratio the surface and equatorial cross-sectional areas and compare to data.
**WIP - these concepts are yet to be correlated with measurement nor peer reviewed - speculative at this point... compared to data after final derivation...
Crash and burn time again???
0 in 2, how about 0 in 3?
***key concept is the dynamic of the electrons blinking in and out of existence, there is a finite time when they disappear into the event horizon only to re-appear. Similarly, the proton is doing the same thing. (speculative, check math)
Derivation of Gravity From (Four Force Field gravity, EM, weak, strong) First Principles, EM Theory (One Field - OF), and Fundamental Constants and Units #2 (static analysis - dynamic analysis to follow)
By inspection of equating the two force terms:
$$G=k_e{Q_1\over M_1}{Q_2\over M_2}$$
To the zeroth (0th) order, ordinary matter is neutral, every proton's plus+ charge is balanced with a negative charge.
Since we are initially discussing an equilibrium (static), balanced, Nature, to the zeroth Order, ${Q\over M}=0$, thus, no effect. We won't bother into going into a charged ball or point, since that is well covered in the literature. However, where we push forward is by taking it to the next level - adding a dimension to the problem:
1st Order, ${Q\over M}\neq0$, Residual non-neutralized charge per mass ratio, ${Q\over M}\neq0$
Solution: treat each mass, $M_1 \& M_2$ as a black hole, concentrate the positive charge on the interior of the black hole, and the negative charge on the exterior. Then, it can easily be seen that this arrangement agrees with Nature, as the negative and positive charges do not occupy the same space/place.The next step is to calculate the effective residual charge. This is done using Haremein-Rauscher solution to Einstein's GR (adds torque, coriolis, for a thrid solution after the Schwarzschild radius, and the spin/charge solution of the 60s.
$$m_{BH}={\beta\over\eta}m_{\ell}$$
We have shown previously that Haramein's geometric-informetric approach agrees with GR:
$$r_s=r_h={2Gm\over c^2}$$
So, now we have the equation to use to calculate the radius of our negative shell of elctrons that are RIGHT at the event horizon. The protons, the plus charge, are all at the center of the black hole. So, now, we can determine the residual force due to the fact that the protons and electrons do not cancel each other out 100% EVEN in the far field.
Next. post #3 in this series, The Far Field!!!
Derivation of Gravity From (Four Force Field gravity, EM, weak, strong) First Principles, EM Theory (One Field - OF), and Fundamental Constants and Units #1 (static analysis - dynamic analysis to follow)
(part #1 of a 2-3-4-5 post series to completely define granvity, and reduce the 4 fundamental forces to One)
(Four Fields: gravity, EM, weak, strong) <=> (One Field: EM)
$$F_{12}=G{M_1M_2\over R_{12}^2}$$
which is exactly the same form as the electro-static forced between two charges:
$$F_{12}=k_e{Q_1Q_2\over R_{12}^2}$$
Charge Neutrality: Sum of All Charges Equal Zero
It can also be simply and clearly shown that the force of gravity (statics, in equilibriaum, dynamics next!) is a residual electrostatic force - due to the unbalanced charge of each mass BECAUSE THE PROTONS AND ELECTONS (+ and -) charges cannot occupy the same space thus the + and - charges are not 100% neutralized.
G will be derived and $F_{12}=G{M_1M_2\over R_{12}^2}$ from $F_{12}=k_e{Q_1Q_2\over R_{12}^2}$
Since we have already derived the mass-charge equivalency, The Surfer will finish this in #2 posts, or will it be three?
Preceded and followed by:
💪 Festivus
Saturday, February 10, 2018
♫♫#SuicideWeekend♫♫
🔥#Qanon #Qanon8chan🔥— Niki ♥️'s Trump (@NikiFontaine) February 10, 2018
**NEW #Q POSTS**
"Suicide Weekend"
"Top 10 player here now"
Wonder who's Going to kill themselves or BE #SUICIDED?
Which scum is spending their Friday night quivering in fear as they stalk 4 new Q posts?! #SuicideWeekend #ReleaseTheTexts #ObamaGate pic.twitter.com/R30l7KKcZw
.. @NotBadFrog here are four updated #IndictmentBingo cards with #Suicided option.. Love to Zombie Helen and Swarthy 😘 pic.twitter.com/pbY4IiiMEc— Severus “Comey” Snapes (@politicalwilli) January 27, 2018
— Mark (@AZGreenBelt) February 10, 2018
McClown traitor, so treasonous, he not only compromised himself, he compromised his Nation, and his Father. Songbird. Wetstart. #BlueHat . #UN. McClown is down. A down'd clown! Downtown for McClown!!!🤡📈🤡📉🤡😱🤹🎈🎠🎪😨🥶 https://t.co/51DzB9ysuW
— Mark (@AZGreenBelt) February 11, 2018
#GameTheory #HearthStoned If it ain't win / win, I AM not in. https://t.co/RlYCQ68Xhj pic.twitter.com/am9pMWHBrO
— Mark (@AZGreenBelt) February 11, 2018
#Q #QAnon #QPost #QMap #WeThePeople #TheGreatAwakening #TheStorm #FollowTheWhiteRabbit pic.twitter.com/mXWILzuX3M
— free will supports #POTUS and #Q (@flagforhumans) February 10, 2018
We are...ready for the truth! #TheStormHasArrived #FollowTheWhiteRabbit #8chan #Qanon #AnonymousQ pic.twitter.com/8EW0jtXx6X— AnonymousQ (@AnonymousQ1776) February 7, 2018
The Surfer, OM-IV
Wednesday, February 7, 2018
June 2014 - Post 2010 & 2013 Muonic Hydrogen proton Radius Puzzle Era
I've had the 4th Order 7D Polynomial for over a quarter century now, (25+ years), waiting for the data... Science requires DATA to back up predictions from the theory, and the One Polynomial:
$$1\equiv F\left(x_0,x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5,x_6,...,x_n, x_{n+1}\right)\equiv F\left(1, \pi, c,h,\epsilon_0,R_H,r_p, m_p, m_e, etc...\right)$$*
* these coeficients are raised to various different powers, from 0 up to 4, thus 4th Order.
The One Equation to Bind Them All: $1, \pi, c, h, \epsilon_0,R_H,r_p, m_p, m_e, \alpha, z_{oinks}$
https://www.slideshare.net/PhxMarkER/mprp4lm <~~~ Some nice early slides we did
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, One ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.
There's a whole lot more to it than just equations...
The Surfer, OM-IV
(©️2018 Mark Eric Rohrbaugh & Lyz Starwalker)
Tuesday, February 6, 2018
President Ronald Reagan's 🕯️107🎂 Birthday Anniversary
🎂
📈🎂📉
- 🎈 Balloon
- 🕯 Candle
- 🧁 Cupcake
- 🍮 Custard
- 🍩 Doughnut
- 🥮 Moon Cake
- 🎉 Party Popper
- 🍰 Shortcake
- 🎁 Wrapped Gift
February 6, 1911 - February 6, 2018 = 107 years
#107
1-911-dia-lite
Sunday, February 4, 2018
Solid-State Electronics - Device Designer
Some of the earliest detectors were diode detectors made of the cat whisker components. Two dissimilar metals or material (crystals) can be doped or naturally have a tendencies for mixed with other nano materials, to create a p or n type material, and the junction of a p-type and n-type material is a diode (3-5 vs 4).
So, in the 80s, the holy grail of the device researchers was the blue diode, the blue laser diode. Now they even have purple.
Memsistor was the supposed missing 4th element.
So, why does is seem all so static, all so controled?
NSF grant to develop 5G and phase array antenna or micro array antennas...??? when anyone could do it??? WTF??? Corporate fascism is beign exposed... the micro-code and companion co-processors riding above are really not so invisible....
more later... ramblings...
(minor
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)