Sunday, October 29, 2017

Updating Fundamental Constants - The Connected Universe Style!


"Scientists update four key fundamental constants

New values of Planck constant, others bring world closer to revised measurement system..."


Updates to fundamental constants are carefully done, especially like the upcoming defining or redefining mass (more later on that in another post).  Many are interconnected, locked in fundamental relationships, so a change in one can not only imply, but require a change in another.  Recently, four $(4)$ were updated.

It will be interesting to see which fundamental constants need to be updated when the proton radius problem is finally "officially" solved:

$r_p=0.8412fm$ new value -4% present CODATA value
$r_p=0.8751fm$ present CODATA value

$\mu_p=2.6666\mu_N$ new value for proton magnetic moment, -4.5% present CODATA value
$\mu_p=2.7928\mu_N$ present CODATA value

Since magnetic moment, radius, charge, and mass are all interrelated, the proton's magnetic moment is locked to its radius.  The muonic measurements of the proton radius have been repeatedly verified since 2010, so this change in the proton's radius will ripple through physics WAY more than just an update to the proton's magnetic moment.

(See previous post for derivation of $\mu_p={8\over3}\mu_N$)

The Surfer, OM-IV


Thursday, October 26, 2017

Magnetic Moment of the Proton, Final, The Real Case #3


$\textbf{CASE 3: Rotating Sphere of Uniform Surface-Charge}$
$$\bar{M}={4\pi\over3}\sigma r_p^4\bar{\omega}$$
from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~pran/jackson/P505/F07_hw08a.pdf

$\sigma=$ surface charge density
$a=$ radius of sphere, using proton radius, $r_p$
$\bar{\omega}=$ angular velocity(speed)
$e=$ elementary charge
$\sigma={e\over A_{sphere}}$
$A_{sphere}=4\pi r_p^2$
$\bar{\omega}={\triangle\Theta\over\triangle t}={2\pi\over{2\pi r_p\over c}}={c\over r_p}$
$\bar{M}={4\pi\over3}{e\over4\pi r_p^2}r_p^4{c\over r_p}$
$\bar{M}={er_pc\over3}$
$m_pr_p={2h\over\pi c}$
$r_p={2h\over\pi cm_p}$
$\hbar={h\over2\pi}$
$\bar{M}={e2hc\over3\pi cm_p}={2eh\over3\pi m_p}={2e2\pi\hbar\over3\pi m_p}={8e\hbar\over3\times2m_p}$
$\mu_N={e\hbar\over2m_p}$
$\bar{M}={8\over3}\mu_N$
$\bar{M}=2.666\mu_N$

$\mu_p=2.666\mu_N$
QED.

Now, what is this quark model for spin all about?

My proton magnetic moment is 4.5% less than the measured.  Does this sound like the familiar proton radius puzzle error?

Using CODATA value for proton radius and $\bar{M}={er_pc\over3}$, we find:
$\bar{M}={er_pc\over3}=1.40119247\times10^{-26}\,m^2 A$
Google Calculator Link for CODATA calc of proton magnetic moment
(this is within 0.7% of CODATA value for proton magnetic moment)
(This, significantly, verifies the equation)


CODATA link for proton magnetic moment
($\mu_p=1.410 606 7873(97)\times10^{-26}\,J\,T^-1$)
(Google Calculated: using measured coeficient and fundamental constants
--google calculator link for proton magnetic moment alt calc --

However, the new accurate value for the proton's magnetic moment is very likely:
--google calculator link for proton magnetic moment NEW VALUE calc --
($1.34687565\times10^{-26}\,m^2\,A$ <~~ This is about 4.5% less than present CODATA value)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton_spin_crisis - solved

Addendum:
Should see a Larmor frequency of about 40.65MHz/Tesla (hydrogen - $H^{+1}$):
(close to 40.77MHz and this FCC Band: ITU # 8 - VFH Very high frequency – FM Radio, TV broadcasts, and aircraft communications (30-300 MHz))
(when calibrated against a proton radius of $0.8412fm$ instead of $0.8751fm$)

http://bio.groups.et.byu.net/LarmourFreqCal.phtml


The Surfer, OM-IV
©2017 Mark Eric Rohrbaugh & Lyz Starwalker © 2017

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Magnetic Moment of the Proton #3: RMS Current?

Using RMS for the current for case 1:
$$\bar{M}={\sqrt{2}\over2}4\mu_N$$
$$\bar{M}=2.8284271\mu_N$$

Which is closer.  Have to re-check current calculation.  
More later...
This is not justifiable in the derivation, as a DC circular loop current was assumed, however, it's fairly close to measured! More serious attempts to follow... 

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

Magnetic Moment of the Proton #2: Shape Factor (SF)




$$SF = {\bar{M}\over\mu_N}$$

For example, the shape factor, $SF_p$, of the proton is:
$$SF_p={2.79284735\mu_N\over\mu_N}$$
$$SF_p={2.79284735}$$
$$SF_{case\#1}=4.0$$
$$SF_{case\#2}=1.6$$
$$SF_{case\#4}=2.666$$
.
.
.

Could this be a repeat of the Silver Surfer's Crash and Burn???
to be continued...

The Surfer, OM-IV

Magnetic Moment of the Proton #1


(this is an investigation, no conclusions yet)

The magnetic moment of the proton, $\mu_p$, is 
$$\mu_p=2.79284735\mu_N$$
$\mu_N={e\hbar\over2m_p}$
$\mu_p={2.79284735e\hbar\over2m_p}$ (*1)
$e=$ elementary charge
$\hbar = {h\over2\pi} =$ reduced Planck's Constant, $h=$ Planck's constant
$m_p=$ proton mass

We can compare this to calculating the magnetic moment of various charge distributions of the proton and step through various configurations and stable patterns until the correct answer is found.
(this may have already been done before, however, I am going to do it again, step by step, to uncover if anything was missed that led to the formation of the quark model)

The proton is a vortex in the aether, thus, the flowing aether is the flowing charge.  The interesting thing will be the correct math for the charge vortex - a stable vortex in the yet to be defined superfluid aether.


Let's examine some simple cases first:  (with excess derivation steps for easy checking)

$\textbf{Case One: Ring of Current at Proton's Equator}$
Assume total charge of proton is at a point a distance $r_p$ from center, just like we did when deriving the proton radius from quantized angular momentum.  This is likely going to result in an answer that is EXCESSIVE magnetic moment, because the charge is actually distributed, not in a single point like this, however, we proceed:
(note: it can be shown that a linearly distributed charge "e" around the radius of the proton would results in the same magnitude circular loop current - TBD)

Circular loop of current of radius $r_p$ (proton radius):
$$\bar{M}=I\bar{A}$$
$\bar{M}=$ magnetic moment
$I=$ loop current, defined as elementary "e" moving at "c" at radius "$r_p$"
$I={e\over\triangle t}$
$\triangle t = {2\pi r_p \over c}$
$I={e\over{2\pi r_p\over c}}$
$I={ec\over2\pi r_p}$
$\bar{A}=$ area
$\bar{A}=\pi r_p^2$
$$\bar{M}=I\pi r_p^2$$
$$\bar{M}={ec\over2\pi r_p}\pi r_p^2$$
$$\bar{M}={ecr_p\over2}$$
$$r_p={2h\over\pi cm_p}$$
$$\bar{M} = {{ec{2h\over\pi cm_p}\over2}}$$
$$\bar{M} = {he\over\pi m_p}$$
$$\bar{M}= {2\pi\hbar e\over\pi m_p}$$
$$\bar{M}= {2e\hbar\over m_p}$$
re-writing to be in form of (*1):
$$\bar{M}= {4e\hbar\over2m_p}$$
$\mu_N={e\hbar\over2m_p}$
$$\bar{M}= 4\mu_N$$

We have a factor of 4 instead of  2.79284735, so this is too much magnetic moment.

$\textbf{Case 2: Rotating Uniformly Charged Solid Sphere of the Proton's Radius}$
Rotating uniformly charged solid sphere of Radius R, total charge Q, angular velocity $\omega$:
$$\bar{M}={1\over5}Q\omega R^2$$ 

Using our proton radius solution, and assuming the speed of light, c, for the ve;ocity of our rotating proton at the point $r_p$ from the center of the proton:
$$\omega = {2\pi\over\triangle t}$$
$$\triangle t = {2\pi r_p\over c}$$
$$\omega={c\over r_p}$$
$$\bar{M}={1\over5}Q{c\over r_p}R^2$$ 
$$\bar{M}={1\over5}e{c\over r_p}r_p^2$$ 
$$\bar{M}={1\over5}ecr_p$$ 
$$r_p={2h\over\pi cm_p}$$
$$\bar{M}={1\over5}ec{2h\over\pi cm_p}$$ 
$$h=2\pi\hbar$$
$$\bar{M}={1\over5}e{4\hbar\over m_p}$$ 
$$\bar{M}={8\over5}{e\hbar\over2m_p}$$ 
$$\bar{M}=1.6{e\hbar\over2m_p}$$ 
$\mu_N={e\hbar\over2m_p}$
$$\bar{M}=1.6\mu_N$$ 



So, here in one evening, we have bracketed above and below the solution:
A too high estimate, 4.0, and a too low, 1.6, as compared to the measured coefficient of 2.79284735 for the magnetic moment of the proton.

These charge distributions that we have examined are not realistic charge distributions (stable vortex superfluid aether flow paths), so over the next series of posts, we will evaluate other more realistic charge flows/distributions and develop a Shape Factor (SF) to compare various possible stable patterns and solutions.  

If simple solutions do not fall out, we will move on to fluid dynamics and solutions of nonlinear systems Navier-Stokes equations.

The Surfer, OM-IV

Saturday, September 30, 2017

Proton Radius: Gooogle Calculator

#ProtonRadius
All of the fundamentals constants to calculate the proton radius are built into Gooogle Calculator.
Why does the mainstream insist there is a proton radius problem?

Saturday, September 16, 2017

Where It's All Going: Consciousness

The hottest topic in science and physics is consciousness.  The next big theory, or theory of everything must include consciousness.  The leading researches are focusing on consciousness, they have been for many decades.


To see how the work of this blog relates to consciousness, see this paper:

The Unified Spacememory Network: from cosmogenesis to consciousness 

Haramein, N., Brown W., & Val Baker, A. K. F. (2016). The Unified Spacememory Network: from Cosmogenesis to Consciousness, Journal of NeuroQuantology

Other supporting evidence for consciousness being key:
Ben Rich: "We now have the technology to take ET home."

Skunk Works logo
Lockheed Martin Skunk Works logo. (Credit: Lockheed Martin)


Connectedness  (@7:03)helps to explain consciousness and ESP.  There is no mystery to it in this framework.  

In the immense density of the superfluid-like vacuum aether, we are all already wormhole entangled, like I stated at beginning of blog.

The Surfer, OM-IV


Sunday, August 6, 2017

Proton Charge to Mass Ratio



$${e\over m_p}=\sqrt{\pi^2{r_p}^2c^3\alpha\epsilon_0\over{2h}}$$
$e=$ elementary electron charge
$m_p=$ proton mass
$r_p=$ proton radius
$c=$ speed of light
$\alpha=$ fine-structure constant
$\epsilon_0=$ permittivity of vacuum
$h=$ Planck's constant
$${e\over m_p}={\pi r_pcq\over{2h}}$$
$e=q=$ elementary charge


Link for Google Calculation of charge to mass ratio of proton

elementary charge / proton mass =
95 788 332.2 s A / kg
(elementary charge)/m_p=


Proton Charge-to-Mass Ratio
First! (?)
The Surfer, OM-IV

The Proton: Superfluid Vortex Quantization


Vortex-quantization in a superfluid, circulation is quantized:
$$\oint_C\mathbf{v}\cdot d\mathbf{l}={2\pi\hbar\over m}n$$
$\mathbf{v}=$ velocity
$\mathbf{l}=$ path length, $d\mathbf{l}=rd\theta$, for dot product
$\hbar={h\over{2\pi}}$ = Reduced Planck's constant, and $h$, Planck's constant
$m=$ mass
$n=$ integer, quantized

for uniform circular motion, constant velocity:
$\oint_Cd\mathbf{l}={\int_0}^{2\pi}rd\theta=2\pi r$, circumference of circle
$$\oint_C\mathbf{v}\cdot d\mathbf{l}={\mathbf{v}2\pi r}$$
$${\mathbf{v}2\pi r}={2\pi\hbar\over m}n$$
$${m r}={2\pi\hbar\over {\mathbf{v}2\pi}}n$$
$${m r}={\hbar\over {\mathbf{v}}}n$$
$${m r}={nh\over {2\pi\mathbf{v}}}$$
For a proton that is a vibration in the superfluid vacuum aether, the phase velocity of circulation is the speed of light, $c$:
 $$\therefore{m r}={nh\over {2\pi c}}$$
the proton being the $n=4$ case:
 $$\therefore{m r}={2h\over {\pi c}}$$
which is the same equation derived for the proton using the quantized angular momentum approach and Haramein's team's geometrical information theory holofractographic approach.

This is implying that the vacuum is a superfluid.

Still need to derive why the proton mass is what it is... and why the proton is the $n=4$ case.

The Surfer, OM-IV

Wednesday, August 2, 2017

XY = c , Mathematical Solutions


Math:
$XY=c$
Let $X=m(r)$
Let $Y=r(m)$
$c=constant$
m(r) is a function of r, $m={c\over r}$
r(m) is a function of m, $r={c\over m}$

What can mathematically be said about all the solutions to this type of equation? A product of two variables is a constant?

Time for math.

#Math

more later about this brief post,
- mr

Some related work here:
http://www.stumblingrobot.com/2016/02/22/find-the-orthogonal-trajectories-of-the-family-xy-c/


And, example #2 here:
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Orthogonal_Trajectories/Rectangular_Hyperbolas
&

Quantized levels might look something like this, however, it must be reviewed:

The Surfer, OM-IV