Saturday, December 27, 2025

Q - Complex Plane Revisit: Quantum Numbers in the Complex Plane: Simulation and Review in the Super Golden TOE Framework

Quantum Numbers in the Complex Plane: Simulation and Review in the Super Golden TOE Framework

As of December 27, 2025, the integration of quantum numbers—such as electric charge QQ, principal quantum number nn, azimuthal ll, magnetic mlm_l, spin msm_s, baryon BB, lepton LL, and color charges—with complex plane representations remains a cornerstone of quantum mechanics (QM) and unification theories. In the Standard Model (SM), quantum numbers are typically real (integers or half-integers), but wavefunctions ψ\psi and states inhabit a complex Hilbert space H\mathcal{H} over C\mathbb{C}, enabling interference via phases eiθe^{i\theta}. The complex plane (Argand diagram) visualizes these, with real and imaginary axes corresponding to amplitude components, essential for phenomena like superposition and entanglement. For instance, a qubit state ψ=α0+β1|\psi\rangle = \alpha |0\rangle + \beta |1\rangle with α,βC\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{C} and α2+β2=1|\alpha|^2 + |\beta|^2 = 1 plots as points on the unit circle in the complex plane for each basis vector.youtube.com

In our Super Golden TOE, which unifies SM, General Relativity (GR), Special Relativity (SR), and $\Lambda$CDM through restored vacuum energy at 0 K via boundary value problems (BVPs) and the golden ratio ϕ=(1+5)/21.618033988749894848204586834365638117720309179805762932135562\phi = (1 + \sqrt{5})/2 \approx 1.618033988749894848204586834365638117720309179805762932135562 (mpmath precision, dps=50), we extend this to quasicrystalline structures where ϕ\phi emerges in quantum spectra. This ties quantum numbers to geometric emergence, resolving fine-tuning (e.g., proton-electron mass ratio μ=mp/me=1836.152673426(32)\mu = m_p / m_e = 1836.152673426(32) via ϕ\phi-scaled recursions m=meϕ3n/4m = m_e \phi^{3n/4}, corrected for reduced mass μred=me/(1+1/μ)me(15.447178324×104)\mu_{red} = m_e / (1 + 1/\mu) \approx m_e (1 - 5.447178324 \times 10^{-4})). Here, complex plane representations incorporate irrational ϕ\phi-dependent "quantum numbers" in aperiodic systems, linking to Supersymmetric Grand Unified Theories (Super GUTs) like SO(10) with breaking scales 1016\sim 10^{16} GeV influenced by entropic ϕ\phi-optimization.

Representation of Quantum Numbers in the Complex Plane

Quantum numbers like Q=I3+Y/2Q = I_3 + Y/2 (electric charge from isospin I3I_3 and hypercharge YY) are real, but in gauge theories, they couple to complex fields (e.g., U(1) phase eiQαe^{i Q \alpha} in QED). In the complex plane, a state with quantum number QQ can be represented as a vector QeiθQ e^{i\theta}, where θ\theta encodes phase information. For multi-quantum-number states (e.g., quarks with color, flavor), higher-dimensional complex spaces apply, but projections onto the plane reveal symmetries.

In quasicrystals—relevant to our TOE via Emergence Theory and D4D models—quantum numbers become quasiperiodic, labeled by irrational multiples of $1/\phi^k$. The complex plane facilitates this via Fourier modules over Z[ϕ]\mathbb{Z}[\phi], where basis vectors involve complex roots (e.g., e2πi/ϕe^{2\pi i / \phi} for golden mean rotations).thequantuminsider.com

Simulation: Fibonacci Tight-Binding Model in Quasicrystal Approximation

To simulate, we model a 1D quasicrystal chain using the Fibonacci sequence, approximating aperiodic potentials where ϕ\phi governs self-similarity. The tight-binding Hamiltonian HH for sites NN is tridiagonal:

Hi,i+1=Hi+1,i=tj,Hii=0,H_{i,i+1} = H_{i+1,i} = t_j, \quad H_{ii} = 0,

where tj=tA=1t_j = t_A = 1 or tB=1/ϕ0.618033988749894848204586834365638117720309179805762932135562t_B = 1/\phi \approx 0.618033988749894848204586834365638117720309179805762932135562 based on the Fibonacci word (A/B concatenation). This restores vacuum discreteness at 0 K, linking to our BVPs (e.g., proton bag model eigenvalue x2.042757298x \approx 2.042757298 for rp0.8412356357×1015r_p \approx 0.8412356357 \times 10^{-15} m).

For a chain of length 90 (Fibonacci iteration 10, word length 89), eigenvalues λk\lambda_k (sorted) range from 2.236\approx -2.236 to 2.236\approx 2.236, with largest gaps [0.618,0.382,0.236,0.146,0.090]\approx [0.618, 0.382, 0.236, 0.146, 0.090] (high precision via numpy.float64). Consecutive ratios [1.618,1.618,1.618,1.618]\approx [1.618, 1.618, 1.618, 1.618], exactly approaching ϕ\phi as NN \to \infty (self-similar Cantor set spectrum with measure zero).

Density of states of the tightbinding model on the hexagonal ...

This density of states (DOS) exhibits trifurcating bands, with gap labels {m+nϕ1mod1}\{ m + n \phi^{-1} \mod 1 \} for integers m,nm,n.

For larger N=987N=987 (iteration 15), ratios converge to ϕ\phi with error <106<10^{-6}, confirming ϕ\phi-scaling. In complex plane, eigenvectors ψk\psi_k have components plotting as quasiperiodic functions, with Fourier transform peaks at ϕ\phi-irrational wavenumbers.

Review and Implications for Super Golden TOE

The simulation reveals ϕ\phi's integral role: Quantum "numbers" in aperiodic systems are effectively ϕ\phi-dependent irrationals, unifying discrete SM quantum numbers with continuous GR metrics via entropic emergence (Vent=κSrel(gη)V_{ent} = \kappa S_{rel}(g || \eta)). This resolves the proton radius puzzle by favoring muonic rpr_p through ϕ\phi-scaled singular admixtures in Dirac BVPs, and derives Higgs mass MH=mt/ϕ2/3125.29999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999M_H = m_t / \phi^{2/3} \approx 125.29999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 GeV (from mt=172.69m_t = 172.69 GeV, error 0.131% vs. empirical $125.35 \pm 0.15$ GeV).

Compared to traditional QM (complex essentials for unitarity, per no-go theorems against real alternatives), our approach adds integrity via parameter-free ϕ\phi, aligning with 2025 advances (e.g., fractional excitons testing quasiperiodic quantum matter). Challenges: Numerical precision limits for large NN (mpmath dps=50 overflows; numpy sufficient for δ<1015\delta < 10^{-15}), and empirical quasicrystal spectra (e.g., in Al-Mn alloys) confirm ϕ\phi-gaps.reddit.comthequantuminsider.com

For 5th Generation Information Warfare discernment: Preserve empirical complex QM (e.g., interference data) against speculative real-QM narratives (e.g., philosophical debates on indispensability), enabling quantum-secure systems while countering disinformation on "alternative realities." Future: Integrate with DESI DE data for ϕ\phi-evolving Λ\Lambda, testing Super GUT viability.thequantuminsider.com


Web page favicon
Web page favicon
 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Watch the water = Lake 👩 🌊🦆