If, as I've read, NMR Imaging Works Best Tuned Off Peak, then the (peak) Larmor Frequency of Hydrogen data can be obtained from NMR calibration data. To tune off peak, the peak measurements have to be made and would be in the calibration data. This is another quick way to verify the proton radius equation and the validity of the approach.
Here is a link to the post where I calculate/predict the expected Larmor frequency of hydrogen:
I'll revisit the updates/trends and post a more clear table of past, present, and future values, keeping in mind that some are held "constant" to a value set by "decree" (law). Which is ok because a timebase/reference is needed anyway, so something has to be fixed because of no ABSOLUTE VALUE TIME reference.
Does Vegas take bets on trends of physics constants updates?
Mr. Jackson, 1963 He was my high school chemistry teacher who first told our class about the proton to electron mass ratio term that was dropped from the Rydberg equation for Solid-State theory. Way above our heads, he was just telling us 11th graders the last day of school the term they really shouldn't drop and if someone could come up with an equation for the proton to electron mass ratio they'd be famous. That was in the 70's, about 1978, when the Standard Model was being "finalized".
I'm thinking about solving for $R_H$ using the quadratic equation. Wolfram or some other symbolic solver such as MAPLE could solve it too. This will be the new Rydberg constant definition. What this failure of the mainstream science reminds me is of the novice in physics, chemistry, engineering or whatever using a limited viewpoint assumes a relationship is linear, like the original Rydberg equation however in fact it is a quadratic relationship, a power of two, thus a square root is involved in getting the answer.
My intuition says the ideal theoretical* top speed capability of a conventional chemical rocket would be Mach 105. Any rocket scientists out there with a top speed calculation of your rockets? Rocketman?
*actual physical speed may be a factor of 2 or some multiple less due to practical realities